So, if you are calculating how fast a baseball falls, you can absolutely call gravity a force. But if you are looking at the deepest truths of the cosmos, gravity is geometry.
The claimed observation of curved light around the sun during an eclipse turned out to be unreproducible, and the scientist that did it had varying resultant data, which he cherry picked through to only take the data that fit the application of Einstein theory (that Einstein was never comfortable with).
In reality, light was warped, but the warping “was all over the place” and did not have the consistency that it should have had if the Einsteinian theory was correct.
“Induced electric dipole redshift” is a theory that fits the data, and is lab reproducible… just shine a laser through an electrical current arc down a dim hallway, and see it fluctuate.
This also explains “the need for dark matter, dark energy”, and explains why quasars can be measured by redshift as being hundreds of thousands behind a galaxy from the perspective of earth, but its gravity interacts with that galaxy as though it is in the galaxy. (As Halton Arp, in the book “Seeing Red” pointed out.)
Yes I also believed that gravity is not force and also that the mass is not the actual reason for gravity but rather the spinning of masses. I have no scientific backing rather than this phenomenon creates artificial gravity. I did thought about this 10 years ago when I was a kid , as a adult I've realised I was wrong.
It is already recognized in classical mechanics that a force may sometimes be modelled as an interaction of a stranger mass with an imposed acceleration field by a local system. Gravity has been modelled as an attractive acceleration field for centuries.
F=m*a is a diagnosis and not a single philosophy. It can be: F causes a, a causes F, F is a rescaling of a, a is a rescaling of F. No need of Einstein or GR scales for this philosophical relativity.
I watched a documentary on Albert Einstein theory on YouTube. It was so hard to grasp. Too many grammar and a low attention span ( which is completely on me ).
But what you just did here made me understand what Einstein was trying to say.
A! Can U dig this: the alleged airliner crashes on 9/11/2001 constitute gross violations of the laws of physics as reported in the official fairy tale about the whole fiasco . . . can U get your head around that?
You should draw your isotropic gravity lines all the way to center and then you can show the radial projection that they produce that runs all the way to the surface boundary. 😉
A black hole is where the boundary layer has been stretched "flat". It is where space/time is literally as empty and infinitely small (beyond the Planck limit).
Without magnetism, no gravity. Its a weak force yes… the further away the weaker it gets. Scientific Lee on YouTube proves this with his magnetic setups. That he does right.
Funny thing about that violent, enslaving minority is... They've figured out how hide the violence and enslaving.
All they need to do is lie and hook everything up to the internet; the slaves won't know they're enslaved, we'll buy our own digital chains that only work half the time, and be completely dependent on the system that enslaves us.
I enjoyed reading that. I doodled an idea about gravity being an electrostatic charge about 10 years ago as it seemed more sensible. The electric universe model seems to hold a lot of weight but I was wondering if I could have your thoughts on it, if you could be so kind? An expert opinion would be useful insight as I'm sure there are aspects that I'm not considering.
So, if you are calculating how fast a baseball falls, you can absolutely call gravity a force. But if you are looking at the deepest truths of the cosmos, gravity is geometry.
The claimed observation of curved light around the sun during an eclipse turned out to be unreproducible, and the scientist that did it had varying resultant data, which he cherry picked through to only take the data that fit the application of Einstein theory (that Einstein was never comfortable with).
In reality, light was warped, but the warping “was all over the place” and did not have the consistency that it should have had if the Einsteinian theory was correct.
“Induced electric dipole redshift” is a theory that fits the data, and is lab reproducible… just shine a laser through an electrical current arc down a dim hallway, and see it fluctuate.
This also explains “the need for dark matter, dark energy”, and explains why quasars can be measured by redshift as being hundreds of thousands behind a galaxy from the perspective of earth, but its gravity interacts with that galaxy as though it is in the galaxy. (As Halton Arp, in the book “Seeing Red” pointed out.)
Heber Curtis THOU ART AVENGED!
None of this is strange to me, but that’s because Michael Crichton described it in the novel Sphere back in the 80’s, and I read that as a teenager.
Yes I also believed that gravity is not force and also that the mass is not the actual reason for gravity but rather the spinning of masses. I have no scientific backing rather than this phenomenon creates artificial gravity. I did thought about this 10 years ago when I was a kid , as a adult I've realised I was wrong.
the big albert
It is already recognized in classical mechanics that a force may sometimes be modelled as an interaction of a stranger mass with an imposed acceleration field by a local system. Gravity has been modelled as an attractive acceleration field for centuries.
F=m*a is a diagnosis and not a single philosophy. It can be: F causes a, a causes F, F is a rescaling of a, a is a rescaling of F. No need of Einstein or GR scales for this philosophical relativity.
If you think about it a little it's as clear as day. Mass pull space, thus creating slippery slope gradient which produce gravity force.
References? No proof, then it didn't happen.
I will see you too.
I watched a documentary on Albert Einstein theory on YouTube. It was so hard to grasp. Too many grammar and a low attention span ( which is completely on me ).
But what you just did here made me understand what Einstein was trying to say.
I am glad I joined your world
A! Can U dig this: the alleged airliner crashes on 9/11/2001 constitute gross violations of the laws of physics as reported in the official fairy tale about the whole fiasco . . . can U get your head around that?
You should draw your isotropic gravity lines all the way to center and then you can show the radial projection that they produce that runs all the way to the surface boundary. 😉
Gravity is not a force; it is a non-dimensional, no-entropic boundary layer our universe resides within.
Why not a harmonic of the universe's quantum light cloud structure? What is a black hole? But an extreme peak in the gain of a 4D cloud?
A black hole is where the boundary layer has been stretched "flat". It is where space/time is literally as empty and infinitely small (beyond the Planck limit).
Without magnetism, no gravity. Its a weak force yes… the further away the weaker it gets. Scientific Lee on YouTube proves this with his magnetic setups. That he does right.
Gravity for me is the Spring on those Clothes Pin.
There's no reason to think that physics lends itself to our reasoning.
In other words... Just because it doesn't make sense, doesn't mean it's not real.
This is why I'm a mathematician. And eager to believe the Pythagorean cult who believed that "all is number."
Who gives a fuck. We've got bigger problems than modeling nature.
Yeah humans and trying to keep a violent minority enslaving the majority
Funny thing about that violent, enslaving minority is... They've figured out how hide the violence and enslaving.
All they need to do is lie and hook everything up to the internet; the slaves won't know they're enslaved, we'll buy our own digital chains that only work half the time, and be completely dependent on the system that enslaves us.
Bruh they have not been hiding the violence and enslavement. You have been chosing to ignore it, why?
Cause to acknowledge and understand it would force you into a choice of complicity or active resistance.
You seem to still be asleep
I enjoyed reading that. I doodled an idea about gravity being an electrostatic charge about 10 years ago as it seemed more sensible. The electric universe model seems to hold a lot of weight but I was wondering if I could have your thoughts on it, if you could be so kind? An expert opinion would be useful insight as I'm sure there are aspects that I'm not considering.